At least the way I measure the economy.
As long as hotels are empty the economy is not turning around.
Written by admin on August 30th, 2010The jobless recovery – it is now official even ABC News acknowledges this!
Written by admin on July 4th, 2010
The jobless recovery is a reality - this scene of people standing in line for unemployment benefits is bound to repeat.
July 4, 2010 – This morning on This Week on ABC one of the big topics was the “Jobless Recovery.” Finally the media is acknowledging that any recovery that may exist (I dispute that we are in recovery) is a jobless recovery. There was the temporary jump in new jobs in April which turned out to be the census takers and of course those jobs did not last. The show also acknowledged that there will be a double dip recession. I think either we are already in the second dip or it is coming very soon.
I have been saying for quite some time that any recovery will be a jobless recovery. I feel vindicated. The lesson to learn from this is that the powers at be do not care about us will lie to make themselves look good until we do not buy their statements anymore. If you think you will find a new job soon think twice. This may be a good time to file bankruptcy when your means test 6 month income will be at the lowest as someone who is unemployed. Also do not expect a new job soon or if you are lucky enough to get a new job it will probably pay less and be without benefits. Chapter 13 is also available as a good way to save your house from foreclosure and save cars from repossession.
Banks violate the automatic stay if they require payment of overdraft balances in order to open an account
Written by admin on June 29th, 2010
Banks violate the automatic stay when they require you to pay past debts in order to open an account.
June 29, 2010 – Today Judge Isgur of the Southern District of Texas suggested that banks may be violating the automatic stay when they require payment of overdrafts or other debts in order to open an account. He stated that this is a frequent occurrence in his court that debtors are required to pay these balances. He did not make a definite ruling but invited the debtor in a case to file a stay violation lawsuit.
The thing to do is to tell the bank that they are violating the automatic stay, ask for a supervisor, and most importantly ask them to put it in writing then go to your bankruptcy attorney and file the lawsuit. If we as debtors’ counsels get more aggressive the banks will change their behavior. This case involved First Convenience Bank which I recommend clients to avoid because I think they are predatory when it comes to overdraft fees and authorize debit card purchases when there is no money in the account only to charge a $30 plus overdraft fee and let the consumer run up hundreds of dollars before they stop.
Growing minority of bankruptcy judges try to close exemption loophole for debtors moving between states
Written by admin on June 27th, 2010Most bankruptcy judges will let you claim the federal bankruptcy code exemptions to keep your property in Chapter 7, even if you moved to Texas less than two years ago from a state that does not allow you to use these exemptions. The reason for this rule is that most of the states that have opted out from the relatively generous federal bankruptcy exemptions have limited their opt-out law to its own residents. A concern however is that a growing minority of judges are ruling that regardless of explicit residency restrictions the old state’s exemption laws apply. This means that if you move from another state to Texas less than two years before filing that state’s law applies and if you lived in more than one state during these two years then it is the state where you lived the majority or greater part during the 180 days before the two years that applies. This may sound complicated, but I do this analysis all the time as many of my clients have recently moved from out of state.
Attached is an opinion from Judge Marvin Isgur that is an example of this troubling trend. The solution is to get a bankruptcy attorney who does not mind anaylizing your rights under another state’s law in case you end up with a judge who takes this position. I have found though that most of the time there is little resistance to claiming the federal bankruptcy exemptions, but in cases where there is a lot of property caution should be exercised in case you end up with a judge that takes this position.
Opinion holding that prior state’s laws apply
While there is criticism of our nation’s broadband policy, it’s still deductible in the bankruptcy means test.
Written by admin on April 3rd, 2010Health Insurance CEO: Premiums will go up – Still deductible in bankruptcy means test
Written by admin on April 3rd, 2010Supreme Court rules that Chapter 13 plans that discharge student loans are binding even if there were legal errors in the process
Written by admin on April 3rd, 2010Recently in United Student Aid Funds v. Espinoza, 08-1134, the Supreme Court Ruled that a Chapter 13 plan is binding on a creditor with actual notice even if it is legally defective. In Espinoza the Court ruled that the plan was binding even though a separate lawsuit should have been filed. The main lesson for creditors and benefit for debtors is that confirmed Chapter 13 plans are binding even if there are procedural irregularities. This is good for us!
The Six Options for Cars and Other Secured Collateral in Chapter 7 – Is your car worth giving up part of your bankruptcy discharge?
Written by admin on February 15th, 2010Here are the six options available for handling secured collateral in Chapter 7:
1. Surrender – This option is nice if you just want to walk away and owe nothing, but obviously could be a problem for those that want to keep it. Most lenders will repossess the car after discharge if you are not current, but if you are lucky they will never formally demand it or try to pick it up.
My experience is that lenders never formally demand possession they just send out crooked repo men to pick it up. You do not have to give your vehicle to a stranger. Only in smaller counties including Brazoria have I seen them get a court order for possession and sent out the Sheriff or Constable, but in the rare event that they do you do have to surrender the car to a law enforcement officer. How do you know that the tow truck driver is not an impostor with a tow truck? Many of them have felony convictions. Adding insult to injury these people often pretend to be law enforcement using titles like Seregeant or Investigator. They will claim they are investigating a “theft” “civil theft.”. This is a scam on their part. Ask to have the name and telephone number of their supervisor.
They cannot take the car if there is a passenger in it and in Texas they cannot cause a breach of the peace so they cannot break into your garage but they may pick it up from your driveway.
If this does not appeal to you then read the other options!
2. Redeem – Is a great option if you are upside down on a secured personal property. You pay a lump sum equal to the value of the collateral from yourself or anybody or get a loan from Redemption Funding Inc in Sweetwater, Tennessee (423) 337-7572. This works best for upside down loans. The interest rate will be higher, but it’s worth it if you save enough money. The application is on my website at www.sabkr.com/redemption.htm
3. Reaffirm – This choice is bittersweet because you are giving up the discharge of that particular debt in your bankruptcy. Lenders will try to coerce you into this option. They say they require reaffirmations but most do not enforce it. The bankruptcy code does say that if you fail to redeem or reaffirm within a certain time then the automatic stay lifts and they are free to pursue a bankruptcy default clause.
4. Reaffirm and Rescind – You have the right to rescind a reaffirmation agreement anytime before discharge or within 60 days whichever is later. Although the courts have not authoritatively stated whether you are protected if you rescind a reaffirmation it is likely.
5. Reaffirm and Argue to the Judge to not approve the reaffirmation – Is this option ethical? If you do it right I think it is but you need to discuss this carefully with your attorney. If your attorney believes that the reaffirmation poses an undue hardship on you it has to go in front of the judge. Even if you want to reaffirm your attorney is duty bound to not sign off and tell the judge that he or she believes you cannot afford it if that is the case.
If the judge fails to approve it then you are probably protected and can just keep making the payments and ride thru!
6. “Ride Thru” or Keep and pay and not reaffirm – If the lender does not object this is the best option if you are not seriously upside down. You keep up the payments but cannot be sued if you default or the car is totalled. You can walk away from it at any time and all they can do is repossess it. Ford Credit and GMAC/Nuvell and some greedy credit unions will actually repossess your car if you try this. I argue that if the lender accepts payments after the bankruptcy filing they have waived the default caused by your bankruptcy. We will see if I have to ever litigate this issue.
Whichever option you chose you need to discuss this carefully with your attorney. There are a lot of considerations to take into account.


