Supreme Court rules that Chapter 13 plans that discharge student loans are binding even if there were legal errors in the process

Written by admin on April 3rd, 2010

Recently in United Student Aid Funds v. Espinoza, 08-1134, the Supreme Court Ruled that a Chapter 13 plan is binding on a creditor with actual notice even if it is legally defective. In Espinoza the Court ruled that the plan was binding even though a separate lawsuit should have been filed. The main lesson for creditors and benefit for debtors is that confirmed Chapter 13 plans are binding even if there are procedural irregularities. This is good for us!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
 

Leave a Comment





buy finasteride online cialis alchohol consumption free slots online free sporanox uses Buy viagra canada lidocaine use in children buy zithromax online mysoline tablets manufacturer buy clomiphene online enhance ezetimibe no deposit bonus casino tenoretic and altice Buy furosemide online can tetracycline treat bladder infections Kamagra oral jelly cyclopentolate interactions with other medications buy lasix online indomethacin and kidney disease Buy Azithromycin Online jett travolta and depakote buy propecia online patanol prevacid prescription drug stores alesse casino online casinos femring estradiol buy furosemide online robaxin information buy kamagra online isotretinoin aknenarben buy kamagra online alendronate tab 70 mg buy finasteride online chloroquine use in thailand Kamagra oral jelly drug label abacavir buy propecia online respiratory acidosis diamox
buy xenical online disulfiram hepatitis buy flagyl online imipramine side effects buy cipro online effects of robaxin buy clomid online seroquel quetiapine fumarate buy nolvadex online cyclosporine and platelet count buy lasix online lozol side effects